Movie Review/ "Hot Frosty"

By Anthony Caruso

Hot Frosty is an entertaining, albeit ill-conceived, adult twist on the beloved tale of Frosty the Snowman. While the concept may sound absurd—and it is—the execution balances irreverent humor with a surprising amount of heart, making it an oddball holiday film that, while divisive, manages to stand out among Netflix's more lackluster Christmas offerings.

The story follows the widow Kathy Barrett, owner and operator of Kathy's Kafé in downtown Hope Springs, New York, who inadvertently brings a muscular snowman to life via a red scarf that she was "destined" for. The plot spirals into an outrageous series of events, complete with raunchy escapades, heartfelt family moments, and a quirky romance. And while the premise is undeniably bizarre, the film leans into its absurdity, blending over-the-top humor with moments of genuine sentimentality. The juxtaposition between raunchy jokes and heartfelt themes gives "Hot Frosty" an odd but endearing charm.

Lacey Chabert, making her jump to Netflix from Hallmark, is as genuinely earnest as ever in the lead role of Kathy Barrett. And while she's not enough to elevate the movie, her charm is enough to prevent it from spiraling into downright "bad" territory. And then there's Dustin Milligan as our titular "Hot Frosty" - a.k.a. Jack Snowman. While he's mainly there to serve as eye candy, he's boyishly goofy in a natural way that will have you believe Chabert's character would fall so quickly for him. The rest of the ensemble is fine enough, with one of my favorite additions being Craig Robinson as Sheriff Nathaniel Hunter; what I appreciated about his performance, in particular, is that Robinson appears to be the only member of the cast who knows exactly the type of absurd movie they're starring in.

The humor in Hot Frosty is a mixed bag, leaning heavily into adult jokes and outrageous scenarios that won’t land for everyone. The raunchy elements push the boundaries of what one might expect from a Christmas movie, with some jokes feeling unnecessarily crude or out of place. However, for those willing to embrace the film’s irreverent tone, there are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments, particularly in our "Hot Frosty's" interactions with the townspeople and his attempts to adapt to modern life.

Hot Frosty is a wild ride that won’t be for everyone. The adult twist on a childhood classic may alienate purists and those seeking a more traditional holiday movie. However, for viewers open to a raunchy, unconventional Christmas film with a surprising amount of heart, it’s an entertaining watch that’s worth a try. At the very least, it's a film that earns its place as a guilty pleasure holiday romp.

Movie Review/ "Wicked"

By Anthony Caruso

Wicked: Part One is everything I hoped it would be and more. As someone who has seen the Broadway show five times, I hold Wicked close to my heart—it’s my favorite musical of all time. My expectations for this movie were sky-high after waiting two decades for it, and not only did it meet those expectations, it exceeded them in every way. This adaptation is a breathtaking masterpiece that had me in tears, feeling full-body chills, and brimming with joy. It’s a magnificent tribute to Act One of the stage show and an extraordinary feel-good crowd-pleaser evocative of old Hollywood, making it my personal pick for movie of the year.

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande are nothing short of perfect as Elphaba and Glinda. Their portrayals are nuanced and magnetic, bringing warmth, humor, relatability, and heartbreak to their characters. Erivo’s Elphaba is as powerful and empathetic as you’d expect, but Grande as Glinda is a revelation. She delivers an effortlessly charismatic performance that steals the show, blending humor, vulnerability, and dazzling vocal prowess. Her rendition of “Popular” alone had me grinning from ear to ear. Both actresses are sure to earn Oscar nominations, and while Erivo’s powerhouse performance deserves recognition, I wouldn’t be surprised if Grande walks away with Best Supporting Actress. She was born for this role - and I say that as somebody who was initially extremely wary of her casting upon its announcement!

The supporting cast is equally brilliant. Michelle Yeoh’s presence as Madame Morrible and Jeff Goldblum’s whimsical yet menacing Wizard are tantalizing previews of what’s to come in "Part Two". Jonathan Bailey’s portrayal of Fiyero deserves special praise, however. He elevates a character I’ve always liked well enough into someone I adore. Bailey brings a depth, charm, and charisma to Fiyero making his journey deeply compelling.

Oz itself, meanwhile, has never felt so real. The production design, costumes, and practical effects are phenomenal, creating a vibrant, immersive world full of detail and wonder. From the emerald glow of the city to the verdant forests and bustling streets, every frame is brimming with life and authenticity. And the restrained use of CGI is both unexpected and a triumph. Apart from the magical "Animals" and a few scenes toward the end of the movie, most of the sets and props feel tactile, transporting you straight into this magical world. It’s a refreshing throwback to a time when blockbusters relied heavily on practical artistry, further reinforcing the movie’s timeless, Old Hollywood feel.

The musical numbers are the film’s heartbeat, and every single one is pitch-perfect. The choreography is not just fun, but dazzling, while the rearrangements of Stephen Schwartz’s iconic score are fantastic, adapting beautifully to the screen without losing any of their theatrical power. “Defying Gravity” is, of course, the emotional high point, and it had the entire theater in stunned silence before erupting into applause. But the standout numbers don’t stop there! “No One Mourns the Wicked” sets the film’s tone masterfully. “What Is This Feeling?” is delightfully playful. “Dancing Through Life” showcases both stunning choreography and Jonathan Bailey’s charm. “One Short Day” is a visual and auditory feast, brimming with wonderful surprises. Every song feels lovingly translated, retaining its emotional weight and theatricality while embracing the cinematic medium.

Director Jon Chu, alongside writers Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox, has created a film that is both faithful to the Broadway production and innovative in its execution. Chu’s passion for the source material shines through in every frame. He seamlessly blends elements of the stage musical with additional backstory from Gregory Maguire’s novel and entirely new material that enriches the narrative. The film also pays loving homage to the 1939 classic, The Wizard of Oz, from visual motifs to subtle musical cues woven into the score by Stephen Schwartz and John Powell. These references don’t feel forced, but instead enhance the story, bridging the gap between the beloved original film and this contemporary masterpiece, and I'm curious to see how "Part Two" continues to do that, making the stories gel more seamlessly together than even the Broadway show managed to do.

Wicked: Part One captures the magic of classic musicals like The Wizard of Oz while feeling modern and fresh. It’s a rarity in today’s blockbuster landscape: a movie that is colorful, emotionally resonant, extraordinarily timely, and brimming with hope. The production values, storytelling, and performances come together to create something truly special. When the explosive finale culminated in the words “To Be Continued,” the audience in my theater erupted into cheers and applause. There were even spontaneous ovations after several musical numbers throughout - a testament to how much this film resonated with the crowd.

In the end, I feel confident in saying this is not just the best musical adaptation I’ve seen in years, but may very well be the best since The Wizard of Oz. Wicked: Part One is destined to become a classic. It’s sure to be an awards contender, a box-office juggernaut, and an unforgettable experience for fans and newcomers alike. I can’t wait to watch it again multiple times in theaters and revisit it often when it hits home media, and I will eagerly be counting down the long days until the release of "Part Two". Until then, I’ll be reliving this extraordinary experience in my mind and listening to the film's soundtrack on repeat. Whether you’re a fan of the musical or have never seen it before, I urge you to see Wicked: Part One on the biggest screen possible. It’s am absolute triumph in every sense of the word.

Movie Review/ "A Real Pain"

By Anthony Caruso

A Real Pain is a testament to the power of storytelling that seamlessly blends humor, heart, and historical poignancy. Directed by Jesse Eisenberg, who also stars alongside Kieran Culkin, the film is a rich exploration of identity, grief, tradition, and heritage set against the backdrop of Poland—a place steeped in history and resonance for Jewish culture. It’s a striking achievement that manages to be both a personal odyssey and a universal story of connection.

The film follows two cousins - Jesse Eisenberg’s David and Kieran Culkin’s Benji - as they embark on a journey to Poland after a family loss. What begins as a reluctant, quasi-tourist trip soon morphs into a deeper, unexpected confrontation with their own histories, their own personal grief, the lingering echoes of the Holocaust, and how the role the Jewish faith plays in their lives. Eisenberg crafts a screenplay that is both biting and tender, deftly navigating between witty, rapid-fire exchanges and moments of silence that resonate with unspoken pain. It’s this balance between humor and drama that makes A Real Pain truly exceptional. While the humor is sharp and dry, it never feels out of place or disrespectful. Instead, it serves to highlight the contrast between the modern identities of our main characters and the profound legacy of their heritage. The film’s exploration of the Jewish experience—tied to themes of survival, guilt, and resilience—adds layers of meaning that enrich its emotional depth.

The performances in A Real Pain are nothing short of extraordinary. Jesse Eisenberg’s David is a complex figure: intellectual, anxious, and searching for meaning. Eisenberg infuses the character with authenticity and vulnerability, making him relatable yet distinct. Kieran Culkin, on the other hand, shines as Benji, whose more carefree and irreverent personality serves as a counterbalance to Daniel’s introspection. Culkin’s comedic timing is impeccable, but it’s his ability to inject pathos into unexpected moments that cement his performance as one of the film’s standouts. The two of them have incredible chemistry with one another, and it’s easy to believe that the two of them are cousins. The supporting cast, meanwhile, adds further richness to the narrative. Each character contributes to the success of the film and have moments to shine, adding humor, authenticity, and drama to the proceedings.

Visually, the movie is a feast for the eyes. Michał Dymek‘s cinematography showcases Poland in a way that feels both hauntingly beautiful and inviting. Sweeping shots of the country’s cobblestone streets, lush countryside vistas, and somber historical sites juxtapose the film’s lighter moments with its heavier, contemplative ones. This visual storytelling not only enhances the narrative but also adds a layer of richness that invites the viewer to reflect on the passage of time and the permanence of place. The story is also aided by the score, which serves as a subtle yet powerful companion to the story and blends traditional Jewish melodies with modern, emotive compositions. The film’s sound design also plays a crucial role, particularly in scenes set in historical sites, where the ambient noise of footsteps and whispers amplifies the film’s immersive quality.

I could truly go on and on about the themes of identity, loss, and collective memory that the movie delves into. Its examination of the Jewish experience is neither didactic nor overly sentimental, but instead strikes a balance that is both reverent and relatable - even to people, like myself, who are not Jewish. Eisenberg’s direction ensures that these themes are handled with care, using humor to break tension without undermining the film’s more serious moments. It’s the film’s portrayal of grief—not just as an individual burden but as a shared experience that binds people across generations - that is its biggest strength, however; at least as far as I’m concerned. The narrative raises thoughtful questions about what it means to inherit pain and how to honor it without being consumed by it. The result is a film that is deeply personal yet widely resonant, capable of sparking reflection long after the credits roll. It’s truly a triumph on every conceivable level.

In a year full of standout releases, A Real Pain earns its place amongst the best of them. For all of the reasons I laid out above and more, it is sure to be a strong contender during awards season. I highly recommend this film to everyone, and can’t wait to revisit it when it hits streaming.

Movie Review/ "Red One"

By Anthony Caruso

Red One delivers a festive, action-packed romp that breathes new life into the holiday movie genre. While not without its flaws, the film offers enough heart, humor, and inventive storytelling to make it an enjoyable addition to the large stable of Christmas films. Despite mixed reviews and a disappointing box office projection, Red One deserves a second look for those searching for a holiday film that mixes traditional elements with an unconventional twist.

The Red One narrative centers on a unique take on the Christmas mythos, blending action, adventure, and fantasy with a touch of darkness. Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson stars as Callum Drift, one of Santa's E.L.F.s who is tasked with rescuing the famous man with the bag in order to save Christmas from a magical threat. The plot finds its antagonist in the villainous Gryla, a Christmas witch portrayed with icy brilliance by Kiernan Shipka. Her plan is deceptively simple and cleverly understated, presenting a unique twist that doesn’t rely on over-the-top stakes, yet personally affects most people worldwide.

The story surprises with moments that are darker than expected for a holiday movie, lending it an edge that older audiences can appreciate while still maintaining the whimsy that kids love. The blend of classic Christmas motifs with new mythological elements enriches the film’s universe and sets the stage for potential expansions into other holiday tales—a tantalizing possibility that may go unexplored due to poor box office results.

Dwayne Johnson, as expected, plays to his strengths as Callum Drift, bringing his trademark charm and physicality. While Johnson’s persona is beginning to feel a bit familiar, it fits the character well enough to keep audiences entertained. However, it’s Chris Evans and J.K. Simmons who truly shine in their respective roles. Evans brings a surprising depth and comedic touch to his character, making him more than just a sidekick to Johnson’s lead. And while the trailers might have hinted at a modern, gruff reimagining of Santa Claus, Simmons offers a surprisingly traditional, heartfelt take that grounds the story in classic holiday sentiment.

Kiernan Shipka’s Gryla is a standout as well. She portrays her with a compelling mix of menace and allure, making her both a formidable foe and an intriguing character. Her nuanced performance, alongside her character’s deceptively clever plan, brings a refreshing villain to the holiday movie landscape. It's Kristofer Hivju, however, who nearly steals the show as Krampus, playing the part with a mischievous and wild energy that injects humor and unpredictability into the film. His performance adds a delightful layer, making Krampus a memorable supporting character that enhances the movie’s mythology.

The film’s cinematography strikes a balance between the fantastical and the festive. Wide shots of snow-laden landscapes and cozy, twinkling towns blend with dramatic close-ups during tense confrontations. The visual palette is rich with reds, whites, and deep greens, encapsulating the holiday spirit while integrating darker blacks, blues, and purples into the shadowy scenes that signal Gryla’s presence. And though the special effects don’t always hit the mark— some CGI moments are downright bad —they don’t detract from the overall enjoyment. This is, after all, a holiday film, where a little suspension of disbelief goes a long way. The whimsical tone helps the audience overlook these inconsistencies.

The soundtrack features a mix of classic Christmas songs and original score, both of which add warmth and urgency to the film. The music swells appropriately during action sequences and mellows during tender, nostalgic moments, aiding the emotional tone without being overpowering. The makeup team, meanwhile, excels in their portrayal of mythological characters. JK Simmons’ Santa is a blend of traditional looks with a rugged twist, complete with silver-streaked hair and a leather outfit that still feels familiar. The standout, however, is the detailed work on Krampus, making Kristofer Hivju’s character visually captivating. The practical effects on the more fantastical characters shine, contrasting with some of the CGI’s weaker moments.

Red One might not be perfect, but it’s absolutely worth the watch. It’s a film that embraces the magic, warmth, and occasional darkness of the holiday season. Ignore the critics, gather the family, and enjoy this fun, unconventional take on Christmas lore. It might just find its place in your annual holiday movie rotation as I can guarantee you it has mine.

Movie Review/ "Heretic"

By Anthony Caruso

Heretic is a masterstroke of contemporary cinema that effortlessly balances psychological tension with profound thematic exploration. Directed by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods, the film boldly delves into the complex interplay between belief, control, and personal liberation. With standout performances from its star-studded cast, it's easily one of the most compelling films of 2024.

Hugh Grant delivers one of the most mesmerizing performances of his career as the enigmatic and menacing antagonist. Portraying a charismatic and extraordinarily manipulative religious intellectual, Grant infuses the role with a magnetic presence that blurs the line between charm and menace. He commands attention in every scene, showcasing a layered character whose motivations oscillate between altruism and self-serving manipulation. Sophie Thatcher, meanwhile, plays the determined and introspective Sister Barnes, and serves as the movie's emotional anchor. Her performance is raw, heartfelt, and compelling, proving she’s a star capable of holding her own in the presence of acting heavyweights. Then there's Chloe East, who rounds out the cast as Sister Paxton. East complements Thatcher with equal vigor, perfectly playing Paxton’s transformational journey from quiet follower to someone who begins to question everything she once held sacred. East’s ability to express vulnerability and resolve in equal measure adds depth to the narrative, creating a dynamic and authentic on-screen partnership with Thatcher.

The screenplay deftly weaves suspense with moments of philosophical rumination, resulting in a narrative that grips from start to finish, despite many scenes merely depicting three characters standing around debating religion. The dialogue is sharp, with Grant’s character delivering lines steeped in ambiguity and dark humor that leave audiences pondering their meaning long after the credits roll. The directors skillfully construct an atmosphere thick with tension, using dim lighting, deliberate pacing, and close-up shots that amplify the feelings of claustrophobia our protagonists are feeling. Indeed, the cinematography deserves special mention, as it plays a crucial role in conveying the film’s themes. Stark contrasts between light and shadow mirror the dichotomy between faith and doubt, while sweeping shots of the remote and austere, albeit tight, setting evoke an unsettling sense of isolation that accentuates the characters’ inner turmoil.

At its core, Heretic is more than a suspenseful and dramatic horror movie; it’s a meditation on the impact of religious structures on the human psyche. The film poses thought-provoking questions about the nature of belief: When does faith become a prison? When does it serve as a pathway to freedom? Through its characters’ struggles, the film explores how ideology can both uplift and oppress, shaping lives in profound and often unpredictable ways. The story resists easy answers, encouraging viewers to reflect on the influence of dogma in their own lives. This subtle approach ensures that Heretic never feels didactic, but rather like an intricate mosaic of ideas, inviting interpretation and debate.

As I stated above, Heretic is undoubtedly one of the year’s finest films, distinguished by its powerful performances, intelligent script, and skillful direction. It’s a film that lingers, urging reflection on its themes of power, faith, and self-discovery. It's a movie I would highly recommended for anyone who appreciates cinema that challenges and provokes as much as it entertains. It's truly a testament to the power of excellent storytelling, earning its place as an essential watch and an instant classic. I can't wait to revisit it many times in the years to come.

Movie Review/ "Christmas Eve in Miller's Point"

By Anthony Caruso

Tyler Taormina’s Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point is a masterfully crafted, atmospheric homage to holiday gatherings that thrives not on a central plot, but on the intricacies of familial connections. Unlike other films that weave clear story arcs or focus on a protagonist’s journey, Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point is more akin to a collection of living memories, much like Robert Zemeckis' Here from earlier this month. Yet where Here spans decades, Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point anchors itself firmly within one emotionally-charged night—the titular Christmas Eve—and lets the essence of the Balsono family spill across the screen in a vivid, nostalgic tableau.

The film is, at its heart, a series of vignettes capturing moments that resonate deeply with anyone who has experienced the organized chaos of large family gatherings. Set in the early aughts, Taormina’s vision is both specific and universal. Viewers familiar with traditional Italian-American celebrations will recognize every detail: the boisterous conversations that fill a room like a second layer of wallpaper; the glint of mismatched tchotchkes that have seen decades of holidays; the overflow of homemade food that insists love is best expressed through taste; the Christmas lights shining off the snow; etc. This evocative nostalgia can strike viewers in different ways. For some, it is a portal to cherished memories; for others, like myself, it’s a bittersweet reminder of how traditions shift or fade as families spread out, or as members pass on. Watching this movie felt like looking through a frosted window at my own childhood, marked by joyous chaos and laughter—tinged now with the wistful realization that those moments are no longer my present.

One of the film’s most striking elements is its refusal to follow a traditional plot structure. There are numerous threads within the sprawling Balsono family and beyond: the aging matriarch, whose grown children face the painful decision of possibly moving her into assisted living; Kathleen’s strained relationship with her teenage daughter as she reflects on her own mother’s distance; two police officers patrolling a sleepy town, grappling with unspoken romantic tension; an interracial couple navigating subtle familial dynamics; an uncle who channels his creativity through endless cooking; another who dreams of being a writer; teenagers itching to slip away to their friends' gatherings, seeking independence in a night bound by tradition. These narratives unfold like the disparate notes of a holiday song, harmonious but never converging into a single refrain. 

For some viewers, the lack of resolution to any of the above mentioned plot points might be a sticking point. This isn’t a film where everything wraps up neatly by dawn, nor does it try to force epiphanies or holiday miracles. The struggles depicted—whether domestic, generational, or personal—linger without resolution when the credits role, leaving audiences to ponder what will happen when Christmas morning breaks. For me, this worked seamlessly, underlining the fact that real life doesn’t pause for perfectly timed solutions.

Taormina’s directorial finesse is on full display here, blending warmth and an authentic sense of intimacy with just the right amount of melancholy. Co-writing with Eric Berger, Taormina’s dialogue feels lived-in and familiar, effortlessly pulling viewers into rooms that burst with life or settle into quiet, contemplative moments. Every detail—from the shimmering glow of mismatched Christmas lights to the distant carolers outside—immerses the audience in the ambiance of a holiday night that teeters between celebration and reflection. The film’s aesthetics, meanwhile, lean on a cozy, nostalgic palette that amplifies the sense of being cradled within a snow globe. The cinematography captures close-ups that give viewers the sense of being seated at the table, laughing along with the Balsonos or taking a deep breath to soak in the palpable tension of unresolved family disputes.

My biggest complaint about the film? It feels cleaved into two distinct halves: the family-centric narrative and the subplot involving teenagers sneaking out to meet their friends. While the family scenes are rich with emotional depth and familiarity, resonating more powerfully with audiences who appreciate the nuanced dynamics of multi-generational gatherings, the teenage storyline, while not bad, lacks the same level of engagement. This disparity in tone can make parts of the film feel uneven. Additionally, the film ends rather abruptly - even when you consider the fact this is a movie without a real plot - which didn't quite sit well with me. These complaints are the only things stopping me from giving it five stars out of five, though I realize I'm still grading it way higher than most people probably would. What can I say though? Nostalgia is a powerful tool, and this movie brought back a rush of wonderful childhood memories and feelings for me.

In the end, I know that Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point is not a film for everyone. Those who come in looking for a traditional Christmas tale with clear-cut lessons or storylines may leave unsatisfied. But for those willing to be swept up by a patchwork of memories, grounded in details and steeped in sentiment, this movie is a poignant, comforting piece. It serves as a reminder of the fleeting nature of togetherness and how, even in unresolved moments, there’s beauty in simply being with family, however imperfect they may be. This film may leave you smiling or in a state of melancholic wistfulness —embracing the complexity of Christmas past and present, where love, loss, and laughter weave an unending thread through the years - or, if you're like me, it may leave you feeling both. While I know it won't get as much annual play as classics like Home Alone and Christmas Vacation, this is one I definitely see myself revisiting quite often in the future. While I won't recommend rushing to theaters to see it, I do urge you all to give it a chance when it hits streaming - especially if you're an Italian-American who grew up in New York, like myself, and miss the Christmases of yesteryear. I know, I for one, can't wait to watch it again.

Movie Review/ "The Best Christmas Pageant Ever"

By Anthony Caruso

The Best Christmas Pageant Ever is an adaptation that brings Barbara Robinson’s beloved book to the screen with warmth and good intentions. It’s a sweet, family-friendly film that delivers plenty of holiday spirit, though at times it leans too heavily into its religious themes, making its message feel force-fed rather than naturally conveyed.

At its core, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever is a tale about community, redemption, and the true meaning of Christmas, centered around the unruly and chaotic Herdman children. The story unfolds as they unexpectedly take over the local church’s Christmas pageant, upending traditions and challenging the town’s preconceived notions. The film strikes a wonderful balance of humor and heart that manages to evoke genuine emotion and which, having never read the original story, I can only assume is what made it a classic. The movie shines in its moments of levity and chaos, showcasing how the Herdmans’ unpredictable antics push the townspeople to confront their biases and embrace the essence of compassion and understanding. There’s a lot of charm in watching how the worst kids in town manage to change the people around them, transforming the titular Christmas pageant into something surprisingly moving.

The cast delivers solid performances that bring the story to life. The young actors playing the Herdmans manage to strike a balance between wild mischief and underlying vulnerability, making their characters more endearing than just disruptive. The adult cast, meanwhile - particularly Judy Greer's Grace Bradley, who is tasked with directing the pageant - adds warmth and relatability, embodying the frazzled yet well-meaning spirit of people trying to hold it all together during the holidays.That said, while all of the performances are heartfelt, the film’s predictability limits its emotional impact. The characters’ arcs unfold as expected, offering few surprises to seasoned cinephiles. The narrative leans on well-trodden holiday tropes, which, while comforting, make the film feel more like an echo of other Christmas movies rather than something truly unique.

One of the most noticeable aspects of The Best Christmas Pageant Ever is its approach to the religious themes embedded in the story. While the original book is centered around the nativity story and its significance, the film adaptation takes an extremely overt approach in delivering these messages. For all I know, this may resonate as a faithful depiction of the source material’s intentions, but for me, it came across as somewhat preachy. The film could have benefited from a more subtle hand in addressing its spiritual themes, allowing the message to unfold organically rather than hammering it home. This might have helped widen its appeal to audiences who prefer a more balanced approach to holiday storytelling, because in terms of appeal - given the box office tracking - it appears as though this film has none when it comes to the general public.

Despite these drawbacks, the film excels at creating a cozy holiday atmosphere. From the small-town settings to the heartwarming final act, it’s clear that the filmmakers aimed to deliver a feel-good experience that families could enjoy together. The moments leading up to and during the climactic pageant are especially effective, showcasing how chaos and imperfections can give way to unexpected beauty and meaning. Indeed, the entire movie is an earnest reminder that the spirit of Christmas is about community, empathy, and embracing those who may be different from us.

In the end, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever reinforces the notion that sometimes the best holiday stories are the ones that remind us to find joy and compassion in the most unexpected places. It's one that I'll definitely revisit during future holiday seasons.

Movie Review/ "Venom: The Last Dance"

By Anthony Caruso

Venom: The Last Dance is a film that, for better or worse, perfectly encapsulates the spirit of the Venom series: it’s chaotic, messy, full of CGI battles, ridiculously over-the-top, and filled with some awful humor that misses more than it hits. If you've enjoyed the previous two Venom films, you’ll find more of the same here. But if you were hoping for a leap in quality or a redefined tone, prepare for disappointment. Like the first two installments, this third outing feels like a time capsule in many ways. It's very reminiscent of the type of superhero films that dominated the late nineties and early aughts. It's a CGI-fueled spectacle that's flashy but feels dated and has an incoherent plot that's held together mostly by Eddie Brock and Venom's dynamic, which has certainly been the heart of this trilogy.

There’s no question that The Last Dance doubles down on the franchise’s formula. The plot is convoluted if one can piece it together amid all the explosions and monster fights. The film continues Eddie’s journey with the symbiote, Venom, as they face new threats while the inevitability of a looming confrontation with Knull, the symbiote god teased as a universe-ending big bad, lurks ominously in the background. While this setup has potential, it’s sadly bogged down by a lackluster script that prioritizes action over coherence. The result is an entertaining but bewildering final chapter that doesn’t quite know what to do with the cosmic mythology it introduces.

Visually, the movie suffers from over reliance on CGI that, while certainly expensive, lacks polish. The action scenes are chaotic and occasionally thrilling, but the CGI-heavy battles often feel weightless. It’s as though the filmmakers focused on amping up the spectacle without considering the stakes or emotional impact. Knull’s appearance, teased as the “ultimate villain,” is ultimately underwhelming, coming across more as a bland, computer-generated antagonist than the terrifying presence needed to set up future movies. 

The film’s saving grace, once again, is the undeniable chemistry between Tom Hardy's Eddie Brock and his symbiotic alter ego, Venom. Their bickering, bizarre partnership has been the franchise’s signature, and here, it reaches its emotional zenith as the two embark on what is essentially a road trip. There’s an attempt to bring a sense of closure to their story, and while it’s not as effective as it could have been with a stronger trilogy, there’s genuine emotion in their farewell. By the time the credits roll, fans who've followed their relationship from the beginning may find themselves unexpectedly moved. Hardy’s dedication to both the characters of Eddie and Venom has been commendable. He somehow grounds the absurdity with sincerity, making it easier to invest in the story even as it spirals out of control. 

Perhaps the most curious aspect of The Last Dance is its setup for a future crossover within Sony’s Universe of Marvel Characters. With characters like Madame Web, Morbius, and Kraven now floating around Sony’s playground, it seems inevitable they’re building toward some type of team-up event. While logic suggests this will be a mess of epic proportions, it’s hard not to feel a tinge of excitement at the prospect of watching these antiheroes unite to face a common foe. (I mean come on; they're building up Knull as a universe-ending threat for that exact reason, right?) Whether this crossover would be good is another question entirely (though let's face it, it likely wouldn’t be), but there’s undeniable potential for a “so bad it’s good” type of movie, especially if Sony embraces the campy charm that has permeated the "Venom" series.

Ultimately, Venom: The Last Dance won’t change anyone’s mind about the franchise. It’s a far cry from the polished early days of Disney's successful Marvel Cinematic Universe, but it has a certain charm and guilty-pleasure appeal that’s difficult to dismiss entirely. The movie is flawed, to be sure, but it’s still an entertaining romp through Eddie and Venom’s bizarre world. If you’re a fan of the first two Venom films, you’ll likely find something to enjoy here. And while it may not be the best superhero movie of the year, it’s a fun watch for those who’ve grown attached to this unlikely duo. Plus, it's nowhere near as bad as the outings for Madame Web and The Crow have been; and I still enjoyed it more than Deadpool & Wolverine, which was nothing but fan service and didn't even attempt to have a story outside of its multiversal cameos. This is a film I’ll revisit on streaming now and then—not because it’s a cinematic masterpiece, but because it has its own unique brand of chaotic fun.

Movie Review/ "Your Monster"

By Anthony Caruso

Your Monster is the kind of indie gem that quietly sneaks up on you. The trailers may not have sold the film’s unique charm well, but this modern-day twist on "Beauty and the Beast" is much more than meets the eye. With strong performances from its leads, a quirky yet heartfelt story, and a clear message about embracing one’s inner strength, Your Monster emerges as one of the most pleasant surprises of the year. It’s a charming, offbeat, and emotionally resonant film that’s destined to gain a cult following as time goes on.

At its core, Your Monster is a story about self-acceptance, rage, and standing up for oneself, cleverly wrapped in the framework of a dark fantasy-romance. While it draws clear inspiration from "Beauty and the Beast", it’s not a simple rehash. Instead, the film uses the fantastical elements to explore themes of inner turmoil, personal growth, and the complexities of human relationships in a fresh and contemporary way.

The premise follows Melissa Barrera’s character, a young woman struggling to assert herself in both her personal and professional life. Enter Tommy Dewey as the titular “Monster,” a mysterious and brooding figure who may appear grotesque on the outside but is charming and empathetic beneath his monstrous exterior. What follows is a story not only about their unusual bond but also about how Barrera’s character finds the strength to face her inner demons and external obstacles, using the monster (which is literally just named Monster) as both a literal and figurative manifestation of the rage she’s been holding back.

Melissa Barrera is the heart of this film. Her portrayal is nuanced, delivering a character who is relatable, vulnerable, and strong. Throughout the film, she navigates her character’s emotional journey with grace and intensity, making you root for her every step of the way. Barrera has already proven herself as a talented actress, but "Your Monster" shows her at her absolute best - and funniest! She handles both the grounded, human moments and the more fantastical elements with equal ease. It's Tommy Dewey who is the film’s biggest surprise, however. Known for his comedic work in shows like Casual, Dewey channels his sense of comedic timing into his character as he physically transforms into a whole new type of character. Under heavy monster makeup, he manages to bring incredible warmth, wit, and depth to the role. His character could have easily been a one-dimensional "Beast" archetype, but Dewey gives the monster an endearing quality that makes the audience care deeply about him. His chemistry with Barrera is also fantastic, making their unusual relationship both believable and compelling.

One of the film’s strongest elements is how it uses the fantasy genre to explore real-world issues. Your Monster isn’t just a love story, but a tale about embracing the darker sides of yourself and using them as a source of power. The monster, in many ways, is a metaphor for the inner rage Barrera’s character has repressed, and by confronting it, she can take control of her life. The film deals with themes of self-worth, personal agency, and resilience, all while remaining entertaining and visually striking.

While the film’s low-budget indie roots are apparent, that’s part of its charm. The production design gives the film a gothic, fairy-tale atmosphere that feels both whimsical and eerie, while the New York City setting makes it feel particularly modern and contemporary. The monster makeup and practical effects are impressive, adding to the film’s fairy tale aesthetic without ever feeling overly polished or having to rely on CGI. This lends the movie a raw, grounded quality that enhances its emotional impact.

Your Monster may not have had a huge marketing push or the mainstream appeal of a major tentpole feature, but it’s precisely this underdog status that will likely endear it to a dedicated audience. It has all the hallmarks of a film destined to become a cult classic. The film’s humor, heart, and offbeat charm, combined with the stellar performances from its cast, make it stand out in an otherwise crowded movie landscape. This one is truly a must-watch for anyone seeking something a little different, and it’s sure to earn a much wider audience and the acclaim it deserves when it eventually hits streaming.

Movie Review/ "Rumours"

By Anthony Caruso

Rumours is one of those films that leaves you bewildered, yet strangely entertained, unsure whether you're laughing at the absurdity of it all or marveling at the audacity of its premise. It’s a weird movie, but it’s also an immensely enjoyable one. Directed with sharp wit and biting satire, Rumours is a wonderfully twisted commentary on global leadership, illustrating how, at the end of the day, the G7 world leaders are just as cliquey, immature, and childlike as the rest of us.

The atmosphere of Rumours is chaotic and electric, striking a balance between farce and tension. The film is set in a world on the brink of collapse—natural disasters, economic meltdowns, global unrest—and yet the focus remains on the petty squabbles, ridiculous antics, and interpersonal, dramatic relationships of the world’s most powerful leaders. There’s a constant sense of impending doom, but it’s undercut by the bizarre and humorous behavior of the G7, who seem more concerned with impressing one another than with saving the world. This juxtaposition creates an eerie, almost surreal atmosphere where the stakes are simultaneously high and laughably low. The apocalypse looms large, but it often feels like an afterthought to the childish games of our cast of leaders. The world is burning, but they're engaging in their own high school drama masquerading as global politics.

The ensemble cast is fantastic, with each actor bringing a distinct energy to their portrayal of a global leader. The performances here are what make the film as enjoyable as it is, with the actors fully leaning into the absurdity of their characters while also delivering moments of surprising emotional depth. Charles Dance plays the surprisingly underutilized aging President of the United States with a hilarious English accent for some reason, which is called out but never explained, while Cate Blanchett plays the aloof and horny Chancellor of Germany. Roy Dupuis' scandal-ridden Prime Minister of Canada has the most heroic and largest role of the bunch, while Rolando Ravello's Prime Minister of Italy is the surprisingly gentle soul and heart of the film - as well as the biggest source of comic relief. Nikki Amuka-Bird's Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is the "straight man" character of the movie and is the role with the most gravitas, but even she's fun in her own right - as are Denis Ménochet's President of France and Takehiro Hira's Prime Minister of Japan. There's not a weak link amongst the bunch, and their chemistry is out of this world - sufficiently real and awkward. It's truly a hilarious pleasure watching them try to navigate a dangerous landscape with only one another, sans any security or staff. 

The screenplay by Gavin Maddin, Evan Johnson, and Galen Johnson - the same trio that directed the movie as well - is sharp, witty, and at times, downright ridiculous, but all in the best possible way. The dialogue crackles with tension, humor, and clever political commentary. The political satire is biting but nuanced, poking fun at the pomp and circumstance of global diplomacy while also making a poignant statement about the dangers of ego, narcissism, and incompetence in positions of power. There's also something to be said about the fact that no matter how ridiculous our world leaders are, people still turn to them for reassurance during times of crisis.

Our trio of directors does a phenomenal job in steering this wild, satirical ship. It’s a difficult task to balance apocalyptic stakes with over-the-top comedy, but they manage it with precision - downplaying the apocalyptic side of things, and merely giving us hints as to what's happening, which makes the movie stronger. The pacing is brisk, and the film never lingers too long on any one moment, keeping the energy high and the tension palpable. The direction enhances the farcical nature of the story, allowing it to slip into complete absurdity at points which is a wonderful dig at the state of world politics nowadays.

Visually, Rumours is striking. The cinematography is stylish, yet less than polished. There’s an almost dreamlike quality to some of the shots, particularly during the scenes where the film’s apocalyptic undertones creep to the surface. The camera work amplifies the relationships between the leaders, using tight close-ups and rapid cuts to heighten their sense of paranoia as the danger they're in begins to mount. The cinematography allows the absurdity to shine through, with playful framing and exaggerated angles that underscore the childishness of these leaders of the free world. It’s a visually engaging film that feels both stylish and purposeful, adding to the overall surreal tone of the story.

In the end, Rumours will definitely not be a film for everyone—its bizarre tone and offbeat humor may leave some viewers scratching their heads, as it did my friend who I saw this with tonight—but for those who appreciate a biting political satire with a large dose of sometimes nonsensical absurdity, Rumours is a must-watch. It’s a reminder that, at the end of the day, even world leaders are just as petty and childish as the rest of us—just with a bit more power at their fingertips.

Movie Review/ "Apartment 7A"

By Anthony Caruso

Apartment 7A is a psychological thriller that, while intriguing, ultimately struggles to blend its horror elements effectively. Indeed, for a prequel to one of the most iconic horror films of all time, the lack of horror present in this film is both surprising and disappointing. Don't get me wrong - the film offers a decent viewing experience, but it falls short of creating the kind of suspense and dread one might expect, particularly for fans of Rosemary’s Baby. And despite its ambitious goals, it often feels more like a made-for-TV film than the atmospheric horror movie it strives to be.

The acting is undoubtedly the highlight of "Apartment 7A". Dianne Wiest and Kevin McNally as the neighbors from Hell, the Castevets, deliver strong, unnerving performances that are sufficiently eerie. However, it’s Julia Garner as our protagonist, Terry Gionoffrio, who is the real standout of the movie. She turns in a terrifically nuanced and sympathetic performance, and her portrayal of a character under psychological duress who is being gaslit and manipulated is truly compelling. She adds a real sense of gravitas to the film, which is what the story desperately needs but, sadly, is lacking for the most part. The supporting cast also does a fine job of what's required of them, even during moments when the movie falters. That said, none of them are unable to elevate this movie to a level of quality above "fine".

Visually, the film has moments of excellence. The cinematography is slick and often atmospheric, even if it often looks cheap. Arnau Valls Colomer can build uneasy tension via simple camera tricks, as he lingers just a little too long on mundane objects, and moves just slowly enough to keep you on edge. However, despite these all-too-quick flashes of brilliance, the film fails to capitalize on its more unsettling imagery and atmosphere. The pacing issues, particularly in the first half, work against any tension being built, and by the time the supernatural elements come into play, it feels like too little, too late.

While intriguing, the story lacks the punch one might expect from a psychological horror film. The narrative is slow to start, and when it finally kicks into gear, it shifts focus between the psychological drama and the supernatural horror without fully committing to either. The demonic pregnancy plot, which is meant to be the film’s horror centerpiece, feels underwhelming and is one of its weaker points. It lacks the terror and atmosphere needed to make a lasting impact. Oddly enough, the most memorable parts of the film are the musical theater scenes. These moments, filled with energy and creativity, almost seem to belong to a different movie. They bring an unexpected charm that contrasts starkly with the darker elements. However, they also contribute to the film's tonal inconsistency, as it never quite decides whether it wants to be a tense horror film or something lighter and more surreal.

Where Apartment 7A does shine is in its connection to Rosemary’s Baby. The film’s ending ties directly into the original in a way that will please fans of the 1968 classic, offering clever nods and references throughout. But while these Easter eggs are fun for diehard fans, they aren’t enough to elevate the film to the greatness it seems to be striving for.

Prequels are always a challenge, and while Apartment 7A has its moments of intrigue, it falls short of living up to its potential. It’s an entertaining enough film, but it lacks the scares, focus, and tension to stand on its own apart from Roman Polanski's "Rosemary's Baby". Will I watch it again? Perhaps one day. But more than anything, it left me wanting to revisit Polanski’s most iconic film starring Mia Farrow.

Movie Review/ Beetlejuice Beetlejuice

By Anthony Caruso

"The juice is loose!"

Given how successful the original "Beetlejuice" was, how much of a following it's garnered over the past three decades, and what a Halloween staple the film and the titular character have become, it's incredible to me that it's taken thirty-six years for a sequel to be made! But, we live in incredible times. Now here we are in the year 2024 and Tim Burton, Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder, and Catherine O'Hara have finally all returned for the first official follow-up to the beloved 1988 film. As an enormous fan of the original, my expectations for this movie couldn't have been higher, and I'm extraordinarily happy to report that not only were they met, they were exceeded. "Beetlejuice Beetlejuice" was absolutely worth the wait! It's not only a worthy successor to the original film, but it's an amazingly fun film in its own right!

Let me get my one nitpick with this movie out of the way first: it is a busy movie. There is a lot going on here. There are so many subplots that it feels simultaneously overstuffed and undercooked. Given its under two-hour runtime, it's to be expected that not every subplot would feel properly serviced or needed. Indeed, given how fast this film flew by, I wish it had been longer so that every thread introduced here was given the attention it deserved. That said, all of these seemingly disparate threads coalesce beautifully into such a wonderful third-act finale that’s exciting, side-splittingly funny, and incredibly zany that I imagine many, like myself, will walk out of the film extremely forgiving of how stuffed it is.

It's clear that Tim Burton loved making this movie. It's the most Burton movie we've received from the unique filmmaker in years, and his dark humor and morbid sensibilities are on full display here, as is his abundance of creativity. Part of what makes this movie so great, and what makes it feel like such a natural follow-up to the original, is that the majority of effects, sets (which look as though they've been painstakingly recreated), and costumes are done practically when possible. This feels like a movie ripped right out of the eighties, and it's all the better for it! Burton also stayed true to the original film in terms of crafting this story. Picking up in real-time, every original character is exactly where you would expect them to be nearly forty years later. Even Adam and Barbara Maitland, who were so essential to the original movie but are missing here, are referenced and we're given an explanation as to what happened to the lovable ghosts. And, despite Jeffrey Jones not as Charles Deetz due to the actor's personal legal issues, the character is still essential to the plot, and his presence is felt throughout. Of course, the fact that Danny Elfman returns to score the film helps make it feel like a natural extension of the first movie as well. In fact, the man does something I didn't think possible, he makes the iconic "Beetlejuice" theme somehow more epic! The whole score, and the accompanying soundtrack, is a banger though, and it's one I'll be listening to on repeat for a while. The movie does for Richard Harris' "MacArthur Park" what "Beetlejuice" did for Harry Belafonte's "Banana Boat (Day-O)" in one of its best sequences!

Michael Keaton once again dons the black-and-white pinstriped suit as Betelgeuse, the lecherous demon, and he slips right back into the role without missing a beat. He's as disgusting, slick, and fast-talking as ever, and he has even more tricks up his sleeves this time. While some may say it's Batman, I have always argued that Betelgeuse is Keaton's definitive role, and this movie goes a long way to proving my point. The man was born to play the trickster demon, whose backstory we delve into here. And that story is appropriately gruesome. Going into the movie, I was afraid that Burton was going to make the demon more of an antihero this time around, but that's not the case. He's still, without a doubt, a bad guy, even if he can be manipulated into helping the cause of good. That goes a long way toward keeping him so fun and exciting to watch. In addition, Burton shows an incredible amount of self-restraint with the character. Given his enduring popularity, it would have been easy to have him in every scene of this film. But he's used as sparingly here as in the original, which makes him more effective whenever he does pop up. Like "Beetlejuice", "Beetlejuice Beetlejuice" left me wanting more of the demon himself, which is the biggest compliment I can give the film.

Keaton's not the only returning cast member though! Winona Ryder is back as Lydia Deetz, who is still living with ample amounts of trauma following her encounter with Betelgeuse as a teenager. She's channeled that trauma into hosting a hit paranormal talk show, while also becoming a highly over-protective parent. Ryder is fantastic, and she gets far more to do with Keaton this time around. Suffice it to say, their repartee is easily the best part of the movie. It's Catherine O'Hara's Delia Deetz who very nearly steals the show though. O'Hara is a comedic treasure, and she absolutely chews the scenery throughout the film’s brisk runtime. It's wonderful we get so much of her this time around, including in the bureaucratic afterlife! I felt it impossible to tear my eyes from her whenever she was on screen, even when she was sharing it with Keaton's over-the-top demon. In the intervening years since the original movie, Delia has made a fortune via her weird, modernist art, and it's only made her more insufferable, which is a boon for audiences watching the movie! I will say, the relationship between Delia and Lydia is one of the most unexpected aspects of this film, and also one of the most heartwarming; the two have come a long way with their relationship since 1988!

The returning cast is joined by Jenna Ortega, who is perfectly cast as Lydia's daughter, Astrid. Justin Theroux plays Lydia's entertainment manager and love interest, Rory, who is just as slimy (in his own way) as the demon that's stalking her. And Willem Dafoe plays the dead B-List actor who’s become a detective in the afterlife, Wolf Jackson. Dafoe's character in particular is so damn fun, and feels inspired by the beloved Beetlejuice cartoon in particular. So does the final new character, Monica Bellucci's soul-sucking witch, Delores, who in life was Betelgeuse's wife. Bellucci has such a presence here! She’s gorgeous with her pale skin, black dress, and stapled body parts, which pull themselves together in a wonderful sequence set to The Bee Gees' "Tragedy", while her powers are demonstrated in a truly intimidating way. Unfortunately, it's her character who gets the short end of the stick in the movie. Indeed, her character and entire subplot could have been lifted out of here completely and the movie would barely have changed. I do wonder whether Burton should have done that and saved her to be the main focus of a potential third movie. Nevertheless, she's memorable with the little she is given to do here. And though he gets no dialogue, and I'm unsure of who plays him, I must shout out the character of Bob, one of Betelgeuse's shrunken-head employees who is sure to become a fan-favorite given his oddly adorable, silent demeanor, and his bigger-than-expected supporting role.

Is "Beetlejuice Beetlejuice" as perfect as the iconic original? No, but it nearly is. I would rank it a smidge beneath that film, but only just. Regardless, I cannot wait to watch the two back-to-back for many years to come in what's sure to be a wonderfully fun double-feature. "Beetlejuice Beetlejuice" is not just a legacy sequel done right, but one of the best legacy sequels in years. It leans hard into nostalgia and engages in just the right amount of fan service without overdoing it. At the same time, it carves out its own identity and is a wonderful stand-alone movie on its own. And though a sequel to the original movie, it pays a lot of respect to the animated cartoon and Broadway show as well, which fans of the entire franchise are sure to enjoy! Don't walk, but rush to see this film on the biggest screen possible. I guarantee you that there is no better way to kick off Spooky Season this year. I, for one, look forward to seeing it on the big screen at least one more time before we're able to summon it at home whenever we want by speaking the title aloud three times.

The Massive-Verse Coming To The Big Screen?

By Brandon T. McClure

In 2021, Kyle Higgins and Marcelo Costa began publishing Radiant Black for Image Comics, which launched what became known as The Massive-Verse. Consisting of books like Rogue Sun, Inferno Girl Red, and Dead Lucky, the Massive-Verse has carved out a successful corner of the world of comic books with no sign of slowing down. At this year's San Diego Comic Con, Kyle Higgins revealed a very exciting new project in the works, the Massive-Verse is taking a leap to the big screen. 

One of the most recent entries in the Massive-Verse comes in the form of No/One by Kyle Higgins, Brian Buccellato, and artist Geraldo Borges. This ten issue limited series has been a unique entry in the Massive-Verse due to its multi-media approach to storytelling. The series follows the aftermath of an event in Pittsburgh known as the Accountability Murders where a man going by the name Richard Roe began killing corrupt people in power. These people had been doxed by a keyboard vigilante known as No/One, whose goal was to bring their corruption to light. He signed off his initial message with “No one is above the law, and I am No/One.” The mystery surrounding No/One is at the center of the series, as well as the identity of a new killer, claiming to be the original Richard Roe. No/One’s centers on the theme of accountability and how every act, big or small, has ripple effects. Plus a little bit of The Purge mixed in.

No/One Preview Issue #1 - Artist: Geraldo Borges / Colorist: Mark Englert

No/One was paired with a in universe true-crime podcast called Who Is No/One, which was hosted by characters in the book played by Rachael Leigh Cook and Patton Oswalt as well as guest stars from the likes of Todd Stashwick, Yuri Lowenthaall, and Loren Lester as No/One. Each episode of the podcast picked up after the end of each issue, and discussed the aftermath of the comic books events. It created a very engaging and unique reading experience but the ending of the book still left many lingering questions. Most notably the question at the heart of the comic, “Who is No/One and why did he do this?”

During the “Enter The Massive-Verse” panel at San Diego Comic Con 2024, No/One interrupted Kyle Higgins with a video proclaiming that “I am No/One and this is my story.” This video was followed by the reveal that an in-universe feature length documentary is in the works. The documentary, titled I Am No/One, will recap the events of the comic and podcast and shed new light on those same events as well as act as a sequel to the series, and seemingly answer the question at the heart of No/One once and for all. I Am No/One will be directed by Kyle Higgins and is looking to start filming sometime next year. Seemingly, the cast is already set as Higgins stated he cast the podcast with an eye towards this documentary, but it’s unclear at this time how many are due to return.

For this ambitious project, director Kyle Higgins will utilize “sit down interviews, phone and drone footage, news coverage, and first-person GoPro and helmet videography from the “NO/ONE” operation itself” according to The Wrap. This may be Higgins first time directing a feature length film, but this isn’t the first time he’s done something like this. Higgins has directed many short films that have tied into his comics, most notably The League (tie-in to C.O.W.L.), Versus (animated short film from Radiant Black), and Power Rangers: Shattered Grid (promo for the comic event of the same name). He loves to experiment with multi-media stories, such as Bear McCreary’s comic/album The Singularity, so I Am No/One is the logical next step.

Massive-Verse / Radiant Black

At this time, there is no official word yet on how this documentary will be distributed but it is being produced by Black Market Narrative, ZQ Entertainment, producers Ara Keshishian, Petr Jakl, Stuart Manashil and Steven Schneider (Insidious, Late Night with the Devil, and Paranormal Activity), and, of course, Kyle Higgins and Brian Buccellato. As far as distribution goes, it’s likely this will be a streaming release, possibly on the Black Market Narrative YouTube channel, since there may not be a large enough audience for No/One to warrant a theater release. The Massive-Verse may be popular but an in-universe true crime documentary may be a tough sell to general audiences. But it’s hard to rule anything out at this moment since it’s still a ways away from release. Even if it’s incredibly niche to a general public, it’s still incredibly exciting for Massive-Verse fans. Especially for the fans who were hungry for more after the end of No/One

The collected edition of No/One is due out in November, and will no doubt find new readers looking for this kind of biting political commentary. But No/One has a very particular structure when paired with the podcast, so It’ll be interesting to see how the creators include the podcast without the benefit of a monthly publishing schedule. Likewise, the documentary may also struggle. While it’s exciting now, I Am No/One will likely be out two years after the book wrapped up. It’s not unreasonable to wonder if the hype surrounding this multimedia story will sustain that long. But Massive-Verse fans are in it for the long haul and will no doubt show up when the documentary drops.

The Massive-Verse started as one comic but has grown into one of the most exciting comic book universes on the market. It’s a truly exciting time in the Massive-Verse, as Radiant Black’s “The Catalyst War” event wraps up, a card game on the horizon, the return of C.O.W.L., an audio drama based on the first volume of Radiant Black due out this Fall, and the I Am No/One in-universe documentary. It’s an embarrassment of riches coming from one of the most exciting comic book universes the industry has ever seen.

MOVIE REVIEW/ AfrAID

By Anthony Caruso

Wow! Blumhouse has had quite the streak this year! Three films released in 2024 - Night Swim, Imaginary, and now AfrAId - and all three have been complete duds. It's a shame considering the fact that Blumhouse used to be a huge powerhouse in the horror space. Now, however, when their company logo pops up, I always end up giving an involuntary shudder and expecting the worst. 

The basic premise of AfrAId is promising enough: a family is chosen to test a new smart home AI called AIA, which ends up become self-aware and dangerously begins to interfere with and manipulate their lives. While it's definitely not an “original” idea, it's normally a solid enough idea that it usually spawns entertaining films. Not AfrAId, however. Despite the kernels of an interesting story about the dangers of artificial intelligence that are buried within Chris Weitz's muddled screenplay, and despite some interesting setup, AfrAId never takes off or lives up to the promise of its premise's potential. Especially not when it comes to its story, its characters, or its direction. Indeed, Chris Weitz - who also directed this film - ends up delivering to audiences what amounts to a Lifetime Original Movie. He tries to nicely gift wrap the dangers of AI in a story about a struggling, if loving, family. Not only does it look cheap, as though it has the budget of a made-for-TV movie, but it's also just boring on top of being bad. There never appear to be any real stakes, nor do you care enough about the film's characters to actually give a damn about what happens to them!

The cast of this movie is trying their best, and is actually quite charming, but they're never quite able to elevate the material they're given. They are unable to deliver memorable enough performances where I could say that the acting was good at the very least. That's a shame, because avid filmgoers will know that this cast is comprised of very good actors! John Chu has really come into his own over the past few years, demonstrating that he's more than just a go-to for stoner comedies but is somebody that’s actually capable of delivering true dramatics. Katherine Waterston is underrated and undervalued in a lot of ways, mainly due to the material she's been given in recent years like the bland Harry Potter spinoff films, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Unfortunately, the two, who play husband and wife here, have next to zero chemistry, and their characters seem intent on making the dumbest decisions possible at every turn. Meanwhile, after a star-making leading man performance in Late Night With the Devil, it was absolutely jarring to see David Datsmalchian in such a one-note supporting role as one of the supposed creators of the villainous AI. Speaking of AIA, though, the strongest performer in this film is actually Havana Rose Liu who not only voices her to perfection, but plays Melody - the flirty and mysterious "advance employee" at the tech company that invented her.

Between the cast, which seems to be simultaneously bored with the material while trying their best, and Weitz's uninspired direction and a story, AfrAId is a movie that is made of a bunch of disparate, jarring components that never coalesces into a coherent or satisfying whole. It's also a movie that, at an extremely short eighty-four minutes including credits, feels far longer than it actually is. And while the ending is interesting, and will leave you with a squeamish feeling in the pit of your stomach due to its real world implications, it's not earned at any point over the course of the entire film leading up to it.

In a lot of ways, this was Blumhouse trying to remake their very successful film, "M3GAN", while discarding everything that made that movie work - including its iconic AI doll - and doubling down and expanding upon its flaws. And though "AfrAId" isn't the worst film of the year - it's no "Borderlands", "The Crow", "Madame Web", or even "Night Swim" - it comes pretty damn close to being it. There's nothing salvageable about this movie, and it's not even interesting or fun enough in a "so bad it's good" type of way; it's just bad and boring, which is an even worse sin. Even for fellow A-List members, I wouldn't recommend rushing to see this one, nor would I recommend watching this one when it hits streaming. It's just not worth your time, and is merely another swing and a miss for a once great horror production company.

The End of The Tomorrowverse & The Future Of The DC Animated Original Movies

By Brandon T. McClure

For 17 years, Warner Bros. Animation and DC Entertainment have been releasing successful direct-to-video animated films through an imprint known as DC Animated Original Movies. These films were based on some of DC’s most iconic characters and comics. In 2020 they released Superman: Man of Tomorrow, a new adaptation of Superman’s origins that launched what would become known as the Tomorrowverse. Meant as a fresh start for the line of movies, the Tomorrowverse laid the groundwork for a new and unique take on DC’s most iconic characters. But after only four years, the Tomorrowverse is coming to an end, and it’s possible this may signal the end of the DC Animated Original Movies.

In 2007, Warner Bros. and DC Entertainment launched the DC Animated Original Movies line with the launch of Superman: Doomsday, a trimmed-down adaptation of The Death of Superman and The Return of Superman. The goal of this new line of films was to appeal to a more adult audience, often getting “PG-13” (and sometimes “R”) ratings and allowing for more faithful adaptations. With this new line of films animators, writers, and directors, could adapt comic storylines more faithfully than live-action films and shows, and represent the various art styles of the adapted comics. Many popular films came from this line including Justice League: Doom (which saw the return of many cast members of the Justice League animated show), All-Star Superman, Superman vs. The Elite, and many more. Save for a few exceptions, each film was a standalone movie, unconnected to any larger storyline. But that changed in 2013 with the release of Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox and the start of the DCAMU.

Bruce Timm has been working exclusively with DC Animation since 1993 and was one of the major producers of the DC Animated Original Movies. He wanted to take a step back to focus on Green Lantern: The Animated Series, so James Tucker came on board to produce the next film, Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox, and effectively took over from Timm. Tucker had been a part of DC Animation for many years at this point but suddenly found himself in charge of a new DC Universe. According to Tucker, Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox, based on the popular comic event Flashpoint, was initially going to be a standalone film but they learned pretty late into production that the “higher-ups” were interested in using the film to launch a series of interconnected films. This series would be dubbed the DCAMU and would go on to release 15 films, and 2 Constantine specials (one posthumously released in 2022 not produced by Tucker), including Justice League: War, Son of Batman, Death of Superman, Wonder Woman: Bloodlines, and more.

Constantine: The House of Mysteries - MAX

It’s important to note that the DCAMU, like many universe designations (Arrowverse, DCAU, etc.) is a fan name that only applies to a particular set of films. Between 2013 and 2020, Warner Bros. Animation released 23 direct-to-video animated films through the DC Animated Original Moves line, but only 16 (including the Constantine special), were part of the DCAMU. Batman: Assault On Arkham, Justice League: Gods and Monsters, Batman: The Killing Joke, and others were all released during the period of time that the DCAMU was running, but were not considered a part of the universe. The DCAMU had a distinct art style and saw most of their voice actors return throughout the entire run, which helped differentiate itself from the other films in the DC Animated Original Movies line.

The DCAMU ended up being a blessing for James Tucker in more ways than one. Before it, Warner Bros. was releasing three unique animated films every year, each by the same team of animators. Since the animation styles were often very different between films, the team would have to start from scratch each time. Creating a “house style” for a franchise allowed them to reuse character assets, which had the added benefit of cutting down on budget and time, and increasing the amount of films that could be released in a year. By 2018, they were releasing four films a year, which generally had one film be a standalone feature and the other three be part of the DCAMU. Probably the most important benefit of the DCAMU was that James Tucker was able to use the franchise as a way of introducing other characters. WB has always been hesitant to greenlight any movie that didn’t have “Batman” or “Justice League” in the title (This is a problem across DC as a whole). For reference, the DC Animated Original Movies have released 20 movies with “Batman” in the title, the most out of any character. With a franchise like the DCAMU, Tucker was able to introduce characters and spin them off into other films. This is how the likes of Justice League Dark, Suicide Squad: Hell To Pay, and Teen Titans: The Judas Contract were able to get made. In an interview with the Word Balloon podcast, after Justice League Dark: Apokolips War was released, he mentioned that it was important for him to showcase other characters, even though it was always a struggle to get them made.

Justice League Dark: Apokolips - MAX

Sometime before 2019 (the timeline is unclear, but likely 2017 or 2018), Tucker was told that the DCAMU would be coming to an end with the, already greenlit, Justice League Dark: Apokolips War. To this day, he claims he doesn’t know why the films ended and there has been no official word from WB. Critics and fans have thrown out ideas for why the DCAMU ended but most just say it was because “they were bad”, which is a ridiculous statement considering their Rotten Tomatoes scores were often within the “fresh” threshold. One theory suggested that the films ended because James Tucker stepped down, but he made it clear that it was not his plan to end. He likely used the ending as an excuse to step down and not the other way around. What’s more likely is that the sales weren’t what WB was interested in seeing. Only two of the nine films released between 2017 and 2020 grossed over $4 million in sales. 

To put this in perspective, the DC Animated Original Movies were relatively inexpensive to make. Each one would cost roughly $2 million or less, so $4 million is a profit for them. These films are also easy to market and repackage for continuous sales over long periods of time. What’s more, Warner Bros. streaming service, MAX (formerly HBO Max), could stream these movies till David Zazlov (head of WBD) wants to save some more taxes. So these films aren’t unprofitable or not successful, but there has been a significant downward trend. The most successful film they’ve ever made was Batman: Under the Red Hood in 2010, which made $12 million according to the-numbers.com. While some Batman films have gotten close to that number, the entries of the DCAMU never made it above $6 million and began to plummet in sales. The highest-grossing film was Son of Batman with $7 million in 2014 and the lowest-grossing entry was Wonder Woman: Bloodlines in 2019 with only $1.7 million. The hope with any film franchise is that there would be growth in sales, but if audiences were voting with their wallets, then it was pretty clear that interest in the DCAMU was waning.

Justice League: Warworld - MAX

Even so, James Tucker was just as surprised as anyone that the DCAMU was ending. He didn’t have a plan for one and was hoping that he could continue for many more years. He had hoped to one day get to do another Teen Titans film, but those desires had to be put aside. He had already gotten WB to greenlight a new Justice League Dark film and now had to find a way to turn that film into a universe-ending epic. Justice League Dark: Apokolips War starts after Darkseid has already taken over the world and many of Earth's heroes and villains have died. Constantine gets a team together for one last-ditch effort to destroy Darkseid and in the process frees the Justice League and the remaining heroes. But so much had already been lost in the battle so Constantine convinces Flash that the only way to fix everything is to reset the universe in the same way that he did during the Flashpoint (the events of Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox). It’s revealed in Constantine: House of Mystery (a short film released after the end of the DCAMU in 2022) that Constantine used his magic to help Flash, which made it so Darkseid couldn’t find the Earth in the new universe that would be created. Darkseid had been an ever-looming threat in the DCAMU, and this plan would allow the new universe a fighting chance, but it opened up Earth to a new, more dangerous enemy.

Regardless of why WB ended the DCAMU, plans began for a new universe that would be dubbed the Tomorrowverse. Named after the first film in the franchise, Superman: Man of Tomorrow, the Tomorrowverse began months after Justice League Dark: Apokolipse War. This new universe was spearheaded by Butch Lukic, Jim Krieg (who wrote Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox), and Kimberly S. Moreau. There was one big difference between the DCAMU and the Tomorrowverse that fans didn’t know, and that was it was always going to end. Butch Lukic told Cinemablend, in January of 2024, that “it was just preplanned. [It was] five, six years ago where we laid out 10 movies that we were gonna do. Because we were basically given 10 movies only, and then you’re out, you’re done.” This marks a stark contrast to the development of the DCAMU, which had no set ending until WB decided it was time.

During an interview with ComicBookMovie.com, Jim Krieg and Butch Lukic discussed what it was like to pitch the Tomorrowverse. “Butch and I had this idea that we would have a long time to build to Crisis,” Krieg said and added “I remember [Butch] and I talking to Sam Register (president of WB Animation) and saying, ‘Maybe we can have twenty films and then end in Crisis?’ I think he said, ‘How about three?’” Judging by this, Sam Register and WB Animation weren’t all that interested in another long-running universe. Krieg and his team went into the pitch meeting with the idea that they could have, at least, as many films as the DCAMU. Krieg told  ScreenRant that “we would have been happy to do 20. But when you want to do 20, and someone offers you 10, you'd say yes anyway," Krieg and his team were insistent and had big plans, but ten movies were all they could get. Butch lamented in the ComicBookMovie.com interview that he “originally wanted to keep doing a slow build with movies like [Batman:] The Long Halloween and [Superman:] Man of Tomorrow. I wanted to take as long as possible and once we gave them our pitch, they said they wanted Crisis involved and they wanted it done in ten movies. That’s why we had to fast-track some of these stories and build it towards this.” Through every interview, it’s clear that everyone is happy with how the Tomorrowverse has played out, but they had to condense 20 movies into 10.

Batman: The Long Halloween

Many of the criticisms that have been lobbied towards the Tomorrowverse make more sense with the realization that they only had ten films to work with. One of the issues that the series was plagued with was the quick-moving and eclectic way the story unfolded. It makes it very difficult for audiences to engage and get emotionally invested in characters and character arcs if the story isn’t properly unfolded. This is not to say that the Tomorrowverse doesn’t work. Many of these films are very good, despite the limitations (except Justice League: Warworld). Batman: The Long Halloween is a near-perfect adaptation of the comic it’s based on and Legion of Superheroes is a great story centered around Supergirl and her journey in the 31st century. The Tomorrowverse, while short, has been very good at utilizing characters outside of Batman and Superman. Characters like Green Lantern and the Justice Society don’t often get the same attention that DC’s heavy hitters do in animation, so it’s been great to have a franchise attempt to change that. As standalone films, they’re all strong features with good voice casts and expressive animation. The connections and the universe-building have just been the Tomorrowverse’s weakness. But, that said, Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths could make it all come together in the end as one complete ten-movie arc. It just feels like it’s ending before it even got to start.

Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths - Part 1

Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths is not the first time WB has adapted Marv Wolfman and George Perez’s seminal event. Famously, the Arrowverse aired a five-part adaptation on the CW that crossed over all their shows at the time (which ended up being the beginning of the end for them) in 2019. But Butch Lukic revealed to ScreenRant, that they’d been working on the animated version since before that by saying “we already were figuring out that we were going to do Crisis before they even were filming anything on their Crisis.” This lines up with what has been revealed about the timeline of when they were told how many films they would get and a particularly weird trend within WB at the time.

It appears that there was a point in WB’s history that saw many DC departments interested in adapting Crisis On Infinite Earths. From TV to animation, to movies, everyone was racing to get theirs made, and the Arrowverse was just the one to make it to the finish line. Before James Gunn and Peter Safran became the head of DC Studios, a man named Walter Hamada was the head of DC Films. After he exited the company in 2022 (in the wake of Batgirl’s tax write-off), The Hollywood Reporter found out that he had been mapping out a new trajectory for his DC films that would culminate in a big-screen adaptation of Crisis on Infinite Earths. Hamada was so confident in this plan that one of the filmed endings to The Flash (the movie) saw Barry receiving a call from Ben Affleck’s Batman that would reveal they were now on separate Earths. Sadly, the changing of the guard at DC meant that this plan was scrapped and a new ending was filmed (this is why the George Clooney ending exists).

While Krieg and his team may have known that an animated Crisis film would be the end of the Tomorrowverse back in 2019, fans did not. But rumors began swirling of the animated Crisis adaptation in 2021 when Journalist Matías Lértora tweeted “An animated TRILOGY adaptation of CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS is coming” and “It is expected that all the DC animated Universes will come together.” Finally, at the 2023 San Diego Comic-Con, it was revealed that 2024 will see two ambitious releases from the DC Animated Original Movies line, Watchmen, based on the Alan Morre and Dave Gibbons comic, and the rumored Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths. Only later was it revealed that Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths would be a three-part ending to the Tomorrowverse. No new information has been released about Watchmen at the time of this writing.

Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths - Part 2

The first part of Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths is out now (with part two out in April) and follows Flash as he travels through time and universes to try and stop an Anti-Matter wave that is destroying the multiverse with the help of the Justice League and alternate universe heroes. Matt Ryan’s Constantine makes a surprise appearance in the film to connect the Tomorrowverse to the DCAMU, which was alluded to in the aforementioned Constantine: House of Mystery. It seems that when Constantine and Flash changed the universe, they hid it from Darkseid but opened it up to a new threat, likely the Anti-Monitor, the villain of the original comic. While the first part of the rumor turned out to be true, it remains to be seen if the second part is. So far, no familiar heroes from other DC animated universes have popped up but Krieg and Lukic said to stay tuned. Indeed a rumor came about that suggested that Kevin Conroy had reprised his role as Batman for one last time in a future installment. 

One of the more fun aspects of animated shows crossing over is the opportunity to utilize the unique animation styles of the various shows (see any Teen Titans Go! crossover for examples). It’s now been confirmed that Will Friedle will reprise his role as Terry McGinnis/Batman from the wildly popular animated show Batman Beyond, in Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths - Part Two, but he will appear in the animation of the Tomorrowverse. It appears that, rather than having different universes represented by different animation styles, in order to celebrate the animated history of DC, the creators opted to keep it simple. It was likely more of a budget choice than a style choice, honestly. Besides, Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths needs to act as an ending to the Tomorrowverse first and foremost. While multiverse stories can be a fun way to celebrate the storied history of a property, they need to serve the story of the main characters they’re following. The allure of nostalgia is strong and this is something that multiverse stories often struggle with (see The Flash for examples).

When asked about the future, Krieg said that "whatever happened afterward would be someone else; a couple of producers would do another universe, which turned out to be the James Gunn-verse." It’s unclear what he means by this, however, when James Gunn was asked on Threads if Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths has anything to do with the start of his new DCU, Gunn simply said “They do not.” Considering the timing of his hiring and when these films would have been in production, it is very unlikely that he had anything to do with this. But there’s also the case of his plans for the DCU throughout all mediums. In his original announcement, Gunn stated “It's one of our jobs to make sure the DCU is connected in film, television, gaming, and animation. That the characters are consistent, played by the same actors, and it works within one story.” Gunn said this after implying that the disconnected nature of the various DC projects was diminishing the brand and many shows were canceled in the wake of his hiring. The question of what exactly he means has come up far more times than not. Does he mean that there will be entries in the DCU that are video games or animated films? Or does he mean that all future video games, animated films, and so on will be part of the DCU? The distinction is an important one, but not one that has been made.

To be clear, DC Animation isn’t going anywhere. Harley Quinn: The Animated Series is still a hugely popular MAX show, with a Kite Man spin-off on the way, and it’s just been announced that Gunn will produce a big-screen animated adaptation of Daniel Warren Johnson and Juan Gedeon's comic

The Jurassic League. They’re just now being developed by DC Studios, along with everything else DC-related. Gunn seems like he wants to keep the door open for unconnected stories, like The Batman Part II, but wants to make it clear to audiences that they are “Elseworlds” stories and not part of his DCU. So while there will be video games, animated shows, and movies connected to his DCU, that’s not all there will be. So there is still room for something like the DC Animated Original Movies, even though there might be a significant downsizing in the amount of films made. 

The DC Animated Original Movies are not huge releases for Warner Bros. and with studios insisting that physical media should die out, it’s not outside the realm of possibility that the line of films could be ending (whatever happened to that Milestone movie announced in 2021?). David Zaslav has come into Warner Bros. to clean house (and probably sell it for parts) and has become a ruthless player in the studio system. Not only has he canceled shows, but erased shows and movies to never be seen again. All in the name of tax breaks. Nothing stops him from looking at the measly $2.6 million that Injustice made in sales (the previous six movies didn’t do much better) and deciding that the entire line of films isn’t worth the money anymore.

While it’s undeniably sad that the Tomorrowverse is coming to an end, the future of the DC Animated Original Movies remains unknown. No films have been announced for 2025, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t any, some could be announced at this years San Diego Comic-Con as is tradition. As for this year, two animated Justice League: Crisis On Infinite Earths films and a Watchmen animated film (possibly two) are still on the schedule and Warner Bros. Animation is  hard at work on Creature Commandos, the first part of James Gunn’s new DCU, which is likely out at the end of the year. So that begs the question, is the future of the DC Animated Original Movies, to end with Watchmen? Or will they continue under the watchful eye of James Gunn to either be part of the DCU or somewhere in his multiverse? Or will they just continue as is until David Zaslav notices they exist and comes barging into their offices with a flamethrower to burn it all down? Only time will tell.

MOVIE REVIEW / Kali Karate: The 2nd Beginning

By Anita Wills

From The Blair Witch Project to Best in Show, independent filmmakers have excelled in the genre of Mockumentary film for quite some time. Sean Russel Herman’s experimental mockumentary film Kali Karate: The 2nd Beginning is complete chaos, in a good way. In his feature debut, Herman tells the story of Sensai Houston, a very bizarre martial arts enthusiast who manages to ruin the lives of everyone around him while on his journey to get his ex wife back. 

Not only did Herman write, direct, produce and edit the film, he also took on the lead role as Sensai Houston, a character he created himself that came from his own personal passion for martial arts and comedy. Fans of the Eric Andre Show will appreciate the film’s determination to make the audience uncomfortable and as well as question their own moral compass for laughing. 

Kali Karate is overflowing with different editing and cinematography styles, as well as a comic book transition drawn just for the film. On top of that, there is impressive stunt work and an original “rap” score. That being said, there is little room for the comedy to breathe. Many jokes fell flat due to the fact that there was not enough time to process them before the next one. Several small characters were introduced, but never reached any character development that helped move the story along. 

What really carried the film was the comedic chemistry between Sensai Houston and his roommate Shu played by comedic genius Shu Lan Tuan, as well as the gorgeous but sparse HBO Boxing’s 24/7 inspired shots which was interesting to see in a mockumentary film. 

The artsy dark comedy leaves you wondering, is Kali Karate a love letter to filmmaking, an overflowing introduction of Herman’s talents, or a farewell eulogy to the comedic avant garde?   

Kali Karate: The 2nd Beginning is available on Apple TV, Amazon Prime, YouTube, Vudu, and Google Play Movies. 

Is A Post-Harrison Ford Indiana Jones Possible?

By Brandon T. McClure

With Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny in theaters, the journey of Indiana Jones has come to an end. This is not just an emotional conclusion for Indiana Jones but also for Harrison Ford. The 80-year-old actor is ready to hang up the hat and whip for good and he’s been very clear about that in every interview for this film. But, like every new entry in a long-running franchise, most people are asking one question: What’s next?

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) in Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

The journey to make this fifth installment in the Indiana Jones franchise began shortly after the release of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Steven Spielberg had been feeling burnt out on Indiana Jones after Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and only returned to direct the third installment to fulfill the trilogy. But, originally Paramount and George Lucas intended there to be five films in the franchise. After trying for years to return to the world of Indiana Jones, Lucas finally convinced Spielberg to return for a fourth installment. There was interest to return for the fifth film, but Spielberg, Lucas, and Ford couldn’t agree on what that story would be. When Lucas sold Lucasfilm to Disney, the new president of Lucasfilm, Kathleen Kennedy, wanted to get that fifth film off the ground. When it became clear that Steven Spielberg’s heart wasn’t in returning to the iconic world he began, the decision was made to continue with a new director. James Mangold, director of films like Logan and Ford v. Ferrari was chosen to bring Indiana Jone’s journey to an emotional end.

Even though this is marketed as the end of the journey that began in 1981, many fans are wondering if there could be more stories left to tell. These days it's old hat to envision a large shared franchise of interconnected multi-media properties and it can be nice to have a definitive ending and not something that goes on forever. Indiana Jones isn’t Star Wars and it doesn’t need to be. There are plenty of books and video games to keep Indiana Jones fans satiated. There’s also an argument to be made that Indiana Jones is a character that can’t be recast.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade was the last adventure with Indiana Jones in his prime because the next time audiences saw this character, he was in his 60s (Actually Indy was only 58 while Ford was 66). Because of this, many hardcore Indiana Jones fans may feel like there are no more stories coming with Indiana in his prime. Unless you were to recast the role like James Bond. Indiana Jones may have started life as a James Bond inspiration, but the character doesn’t share the one thing that has made Bond such a lasting icon: his recasting. At this point in the franchise, recasting Indiana Jones would be difficult if not downright impossible

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) in Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

A few months ago, rumors began circulating that Lucasfilm was interested in developing a Disney+ original series set in the world of Indiana Jones. The proposed series was going to be a prequel about Indiana’s mentor, Abner Ravenwood. Abner is a character that every fan is familiar with but has never been seen onscreen due to his death prior to the events of Raiders of the Lost Ark. However, it now appears that Lucasfilm is restructuring to focus solely on Star Wars properties. Once again, rumors suggest that this series is no longer moving forward and with the cancellation of Willow, it appears that there’s no interest from Disney to allow Lucasfilm to develop anything outside of their biggest money maker once Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny is released.

This rumored Abner Ravenwood series wasn’t even the first time Lucasfilm seemed interested in developing a spin-off without Indiana Jones. Before Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, rumors were rampant about future plans for Shia Labeouf’s Mutt Williams’ character. It’s entirely possible, had that character, and movie, been better received (Although it was one of the highest-grossing films of 2008 and currently holds a respectable 77% on Rotten Tomatoes) there would have been a spin-off adventure with the character. Mutt Williams was introduced in the fourth film as the son of Indiana and Marion Ravenwood, which seemed like the perfect character to take over the hat and whip. After the film, Lebeouf said “I feel like I dropped the ball on the legacy that people loved and cherished” which ended up ruining his relationship with Spielberg. While no official plans seemed to be in the works for an “Adventure of Mutt Williams” film, this seemed to squash the idea altogether.

Fans have wanted one specific Indiana Jones spin-off for decades, however. One that would center on Indiana’s one-time side-kick in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Short Round. Played by now Oscar-winning actor Ke Huy Quan, the character has been a beloved member of the franchise for years now. While the film wasn’t as well received at the time, it’s been reevaluated and admired as a misunderstood classic. Quan’s turn in Everything Everywhere All At Once has brought the actor back in a big way. He’s even a starring role in the Disney+ series American Born Chinese. Quan, himself has said he’s love to return exclaiming “Are you kidding me? I love Short Round… it would be amazing to revisit that character.” While many, rightly, feel that Quan should focus on new projects, rather than returning to a franchise he was a part of when he was 10, the actor is obviously keen to reprise the role.

The Indiana Jones franchise doesn’t need to be a franchise that spans 30 interconnected films with an Avengers-style team-up at the end to defeat Hitler. But if John Wick can get a spin-off called Ballerina, there’s room for one spin-off in the Indiana Jones franchise. That’s all fans have ever wanted, just one spin-off. One movie or show to play in the world without relying on Harrison Ford. Especially now that Ke Huy Quan is on top, Disney may want to strike while the iron is hot and greenlight a Short Round series.

There are many comics, books and video games that star Indiana Jones, including one coming before the end of the decade (we hope), so there are plenty of stories for fans to explore if they want more. It’s not necessary for the franchise to continue now that Harrison Ford is hanging up the fedora, but it could be fun to explore new places and perspectives of the world that fans love. It doesn’t need to be a Star Wars-like juggernaut mult-media franchise or a massive shared universe like the MCU. All fans have ever wanted was one more adventure. What’s so wrong about that?

SOPHIA'S SECOND LOOK: Drop Dead Fred

By Sophia Anita Reyes ( @sophia_toto_girlpower )

I recently rewatched Drop Dead Fred, the 1991 dark comedy/fantasy film for the first time since I was about 11 years old. I am unsure why I had such fond happy memories of this misunderstood box office flop. After watching the film as a 34 year old woman, I was in an immobile physical state of shock. I sat there for about 10 mins alternating from sobbing my eyes out, to staring at the wall with my mouth wide open thinking “What the hell did I just watch?” and “What are these feelings I am feeling?!” 

Drop Dead Fred is about a grown woman named Elizabth whose agent of chaos, childhood imaginary friend Fred, comes back to help her take control of her life. Her life that is very much in the hands of her ultra dominant, power tripping mother who Fred likes to call “the Mega bitch”, and her manipulative weasel like fiancé. The film has many flashbacks of the destruction and ruin that Fred and Elizabth caused, which drove her mother to insanity. 

Drop Dead Fred (Rik Mayall) and Elizabeth “Lizzie” (Phoebe Cates) in Drop Dead Fred.

I have this gut feeling that there is one important question that no one asked on set or during production, not the producers, the actors, or even the director. The question is, who is this movie for? Is it for kids? The whole family? Or the scariest answer.. is it for me? After I was able to come out of my immobile state of shock, I realized that the film is a grotesque but beautiful guide on how to love your younger self by battling your childhood trauma. That’s when I also realized that yes, this film is for me, someone who has had trouble challenging authority since a young age and staying away from manipulative weasels. Along with being a movie that will completely just fuck with your un-dealt emotions, it is kind of a cinematic masterpiece in itself. The story progression, character development, set design, special effects makeup, et cetera, are all flawless. There are no holes in this film, no dull moments. The most powerful scene is at the very end when Elizabeth becomes so overwhelmed with her trauma that she passes out and takes a trip into her imagination and back to her childhood home with Fred, where it is time to face her biggest fears.

Elizabeth “Lizzie” (Phoebe Cates) and Drop Dead Fred (Rik Mayall) in Drop Dead Fred.

The inside of the immaculate house is enormous and dark. Menacing shadows looming everywhere and furniture with edges so sharp they look like they could cut you. Elizabeth uses her imagination to navigate the intimidating home. Standing there as a grown woman she puts her hands on her temples, shuts her eyes. Suddenly a giant beautiful tree grows in the middle of the foyer. This particular moment really gutted me. Seeing a grown woman confidently tap into her imagination to solve a problem was a shocking sight to see. Using your imagination is what children do, not adults. We grew up, we are not allowed to be silly or fantastical anymore. Fred and Elizabeth climb the tree, but unfortunately her mother is waiting at the top of the stairs, guarding Elizabeth's childhood bedroom door, not allowing them to pass. 

Elizabeth fearlessly screams “I’m not afraid of you!” in her mother’s face and after hearing this, the mother bursts into epic flames. At this point, my face is soaked with tears, how could this film get under my skin any deeper than it already has? Well you just wait. 

 In the beginning of the film, Elizabeth's mother has had enough of her tiny daughter’s rebellion and duct tapes Fred back into his jack in the box so he can never escape again. When grown up Elizabth opens the bedroom door that her mother was guarding, she finds her childhood self duct taped to the bed. Elizabeth tears the duct tape away and gives her younger self a big hug, telling her “we don’t have to be afraid anymore”. The duct tape represents the constricting restraint that the mother had over Elizabeth, and the tearing represents Elizabeth using her voice and taking the power back.  Do you understand now why I was in such a state of vulnerability and shock?

Drop Dead Fred (Rik Mayall) and Elizabeth’s mother Polly (Marsha Mason) in Drop Dead Fred.

To be honest, I’m not surprised that his film was a giant flop. No one understood it, but most importantly, no one cared to try and understand it. If they did, they would see that it is a beautifully dark film that challenges its audience to be vulnerable, and to not be ashamed of using your imagination. 

INTERVIEW / Actor & Recording Artist - Jovan Armand

We have a very special episode this week with a very special guest. Kyle and Dave are joined by one of the stars of the recently released Shazam: Fury of the Gods, Jovan Armand. Jovan joins us to talk about the new movie, how he was cast in the original film, and what got him into acting. He also talks about his new song that he recorded and is available NOW!

Interview can also be found on your favorite podcast app at Atomic Geekdom @atomicgeekdom

MOVIE REVIEW / Cocaine Bear

By DeeDee Baldwin

** This article contains mild spoilers. **

There is a scene at the beginning of director Elizabeth Banks’ Cocaine Bear when a hiker’s bitten-off lower leg is flung into frame, and the viewer thinks, “Should I be laughing at this?” It’s the first of many such moments to come.

Horror-comedy is, of course, nothing new. Cocaine Bear follows in the bloody footsteps of cult classics like the Evil Dead series, Tucker and Dale vs Evil, and even, in some respects, Fargo. “What is it in the human condition,” asks author Bruce G. Hallenbeck in Comedy-Horror Films: A Chronological History, 1914-2008, “that makes us want to laugh at the darkness around us?” If we laugh in horror at a woman’s foot sticking out of a woodchipper or at a man’s dismembered body falling from a tree, is something wrong with us?

Sari (Keri Russell) in Cocaine Bear.

Not at all. "The common misconception about laughter is that laughter is, for the most part, a response to humor," researcher Diana Mahony told ABC’s Joseph Brownstein in 2008. Rather, laughter is more like “a steam gauge, where a buildup of feelings prompts an outburst.” This is why some people smile or laugh at funerals or when they’re around a friend who is crying. They aren’t sadistic, and they don’t suffer from antisocial personality disorder. In the perceived absence of other outlets—especially because so many people are extremely uncomfortable crying around others—laughter might be all they have left. Most of us have watched horror movies, even ones that are meant to be totally serious, and laughed at an intense death scene. Did young people in your movie theater laugh when Boromir wept in Fellowship of the Ring or when Katniss sobbed and screamed at her sister’s cat in Mockingjay – Part 2? Intense emotions like grief and fear can be too overwhelming for some people to process. The more effectively such intensity is conveyed, the more likely you are to hear giggles in your theater.

But laughter in movies like Cocaine Bear or Tucker and Dale isn’t only an outlet for big feelings. It is the intended response. There is obvious humor like Margo Martindale’s “dusty beaver,” the billboard advertising a glory hole, and the coked-out bear collapsing, exhausted, on top of a man. There is an ambulance sequence that ratchets up both tension and absurdity until the viewer is simultaneously hiding her eyes and laughing like a valve releasing steam. In one wry scene, a character mentions his two friends (both dead, unknown to him), and Banks cuts to a shot of their corpses that looks like a macabre Halloween yard display. 

Stache (Aaron Holiday) and Jr. (O’Shea Jackson) in Cocaine Bear.

While most of the movie’s deaths are comedic in their horror, not all are played for laughs. One character’s death is quiet, dignified, and poignant – and it is well-earned. For another towards the end, Banks goes all-in on the gore, but there’s more schadenfreude than humor in it.

Cocaine Bear is a comedy in the most classical definition of the term: a humorous take on flawed humans—Aristotle’s “inferior people”—and their foibles, with the requisite happy ending. It is also a morality play in which each of our heroes must fall and be redeemed. I use the term “heroes” lightly; one of them is, after all, a hired gun for a drug lord. Children learn not to skip school and do drugs, and career criminals ride off with a cute little dog. If it took some decapitations, stray body parts from legs to fingers, and a disemboweling, isn’t the most important thing that we’re all better humans in the end? Dante would say yes.

Oh, and I’m forgetting the most important part of this comedic, horrific morality play: it will leave you cheering for a coked-up bear family. And that’s the best part of all.